Hybrid Deep Learning Models With Attention Mechanisms For Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review And Benchmarking Of CNN–Bilstm–Attention Using Synthetic SCADA-Style Data For Robust Preliminary Validation

Authors

  • Er. Rishabh Aryan M. Tech (Artificial Intelligence and Data Science), Department of CSE, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Bhagalpur (Bihar) Author
  • Prof. Dr. Tryambak Hiwarkar Director, ASM Group of Institutions, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63665/IJMEC.1105.01

Keywords:

Wind Speed Forecasting, CNN–BiLSTM–Attention, Hybrid Deep Learning, Attention Mechanism, Synthetic SCADA Data, Preliminary Validation, Renewable Energy Integration

Abstract

The integration of wind energy into modern power systems demands forecasting frameworks capable of handling the non-linear, non-stationary, and chaotic behaviour of wind dynamics. While machine learning and deep learning approaches have individually demonstrated substantial gains over classical statistical methods, hybrid architectures coupling convolutional feature extraction with bidirectional recurrent memory and attention mechanisms have recently emerged as the most promising paradigm for short-term wind speed prediction. This paper presents a comprehensive review of hybrid deep learning models with attention mechanisms and introduces a preliminary benchmarking of a CNN–BiLSTM–Attention architecture using a synthetic SCADA-style hourly dataset. The synthetic dataset was generated to replicate the statistical properties of real onshore wind turbine telemetry, including diurnal cycles, seasonal variability, and stochastic fluctuations characteristic of Indian wind corridors. Six forecasting models were benchmarked: ARIMA, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest, XG Boost, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and the proposed CNN–BiLSTM–Attention hybrid. Using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R²) as evaluation metrics, the hybrid model achieved the lowest errors (MAE = 0.83 m/s, RMSE = 1.15 m/s, MAPE = 13.8%, R² = 0.923) and demonstrated robust behaviour across low-, medium-, and high-wind regimes. The controlled synthetic environment provides a reproducible baseline for assessing architectural stability before deployment on field data. Findings confirm that the CNN–BiLSTM–Attention architecture delivers consistent improvements over both classical and standalone deep learning baselines, and establish a structured protocol for preliminary validation of hybrid forecasting models prior to real-SCADA deployment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.0473

[2]. Chen, J., Zeng, G.-Q., Zhou, W., Du, W., & Lu, K.-D. (2021). Wind speed forecasting using nonlinear-learning ensemble of deep learning time series prediction and extremal optimization. Energy Conversion and Management, 165, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.098

[3]. Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599

[4]. Foley, A. M., Leahy, P. G., Marvuglia, A., & McKeogh, E. J. (2012). Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation. Renewable Energy, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033

[5]. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). (2024). Global Wind Report 2024. Brussels: GWEC.

[6]. Hanifi, S., Liu, X., Lin, Z., & Lotfian, S. (2020). A critical review of wind power forecasting methods—Past, present and future. Energies, 13(15), 3764. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153764

[7]. Heinermann, J., & Kramer, O. (2016). Machine learning ensembles for wind power prediction. Renewable Energy, 89, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.073

[8]. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

[9]. Kisvari, A., Lin, Z., & Liu, X. (2021). Wind power forecasting — A data-driven method along with gated recurrent neural network. Renewable Energy, 163, 1895–1909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.119

[10]. Kumar, G., & Kaur, A. (2020). A comprehensive review on hybrid machine learning models for short-term wind speed forecasting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130, 109956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109956

[11]. Li, Y., Shi, H., Han, F., Duan, Z., & Liu, H. (2019). Smart wind speed forecasting approach using various boosting algorithms, big multi-step forecasting strategy. Renewable Energy, 135, 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.035

[12]. Liu, H., Mi, X., & Li, Y. (2021). Smart deep learning based wind speed prediction model using wavelet packet decomposition, convolutional neural network and convolutional long short term memory network. Energy Conversion and Management, 166, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.021

[13]. Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.2.297

[14]. Mujeeb, S., Alghamdi, T. A., Ullah, S., Fatima, A., Javaid, N., & Saba, T. (2020). Exploiting deep learning for wind power forecasting based on big data analytics. Applied Sciences, 9(20), 4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204417

[15]. Neshat, M., Nezhad, M. M., Abbasnejad, E., Mirjalili, S., Groppi, D., Heydari, A., Tjernberg, L. B., Garcia, D. A., Alexander, B., Shi, Q., & Wagner, M. (2021). Wind turbine power output prediction using a new hybrid neuro-evolutionary method. Energy, 229, 120617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120617

[16]. Shahid, F., Zameer, A., & Muneeb, M. (2021). A novel genetic LSTM model for wind power forecast. Energy, 223, 120069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120069

[17]. Sharma, A., & Srinivasan, D. (2022). Synthetic time-series benchmarking for evaluating deep learning forecasting models. Energy and AI, 9, 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100166

[18]. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

[19]. Wang, Y., Hu, Q., Srinivasan, D., & Wang, Z. (2020). Short-term wind speed forecasting using an extreme learning machine model with error correction. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 4509–4524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3652-5

[20]. Zhang, Y., Pan, G., Chen, B., Han, J., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, C. (2022). Short-term wind speed prediction model based on GA-ANN improved by VMD. Renewable Energy, 156, 1373–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.047

Downloads

Published

2026-05-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hybrid Deep Learning Models With Attention Mechanisms For Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review And Benchmarking Of CNN–Bilstm–Attention Using Synthetic SCADA-Style Data For Robust Preliminary Validation. (2026). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering In Current Research, 11(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.63665/IJMEC.1105.01