Nonlinear Seismic Assessment Of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63665/m8asds91Keywords:
Performance-Based Design; Nonlinear Pushover Analysis; Reinforced Concrete; Seismic Vulnerability; Inter-storey Drift; Capacity Spectrum Method; Damage IndexAbstract
Reinforced concrete buildings in seismically active regions increasingly rely on performance-based design (PBD)
rather than conventional force-based procedures, since the latter offers only an implicit and often unreliable
estimate of actual structural behaviour under strong ground motion. This study evaluates the seismic performance
of three reinforced concrete buildings of varying height, eight, twelve, and sixteen storeys, situated in Seismic
Zone IV, using nonlinear static pushover analysis and the capacity spectrum method as prescribed in ASCE 41
17 and FEMA 440 guidelines [1]. Structural models were developed in ETABS with plastic hinge assignments at
beam and column ends calibrated against experimental moment-curvature data. Pushover curves, performance
points, inter-storey drift ratios, and Park-Ang damage indices were extracted for each building and compared
against target performance objectives of Immediate Occupancy, Life Safety, and Collapse Prevention. The results
indicate that taller buildings exhibited progressively higher concentrations of drift near the mid-height region
and correspondingly elevated damage indices at beam-column joints, a pattern that raises questions about the
adequacy of uniform ductile detailing across height. Building A satisfied the Life Safety objective comfortably,
Building B approached the threshold with localized joint distress, and Building C exceeded acceptable drift limits
at three storeys, suggesting a need for supplemental damping or stiffness modification. Comparison with five prior
studies confirms that the present findings are broadly consistent with regional trends reported for similar
structural typologies, while also revealing discrepancies attributable to differences in hinge modelling
assumptions. The study concludes that performance-based evaluation provides a more defensible basis for seismic
retrofit prioritization than code-based drift checks alone, particularly for mid-to-high-rise reinforced concrete
construction in zones of high seismicity [2].
